Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

B402, You don't seem to understand you are not contributing anything new. Inequality has been a major focus of this board since whenever. And focus on corporation contribution to it the same. And to your comment that some may see you as anti-capitalist because of your criticism of corporations, damn. About every one here has been there before you here. On that point i don't recall even one post of yours questioning problems with American capitalism. There are many on the board with that focus . If i've missed one of yours please give it to me.

You are like a dog with a bone in your it's all dems fault. They started the offshoring of jobs, you say. They started the drift to the inequality which is such a huge problem today, you say. Then when you are given evidence that is not as true as you see it:

Forever? Garbage. The Clinton's did not change the Democrat Party forever. And the thought occurs,
if they had not gone for the big money could they have broken the Reagan - HW Bush procession.
[...]
NAFTA and other trade deals have not gutted American manufacturing — period
[...]
The White House is only telling you half of the sad story of what happened to American jobs
[...]The problem didn't start in the 1990s, it started in the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan — a hero of the Trump administration — was president, and neoliberal economics were first making their mark on policy.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170912172
P - This ideology ultimately led to the financialization of the US corporation
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170912172

You stick with it's dems fault.

Democrats gave up their principles, you say. When you are given an opinion that is not as true as you feel it is you go back to your same old bone. And all this is not to say that focus of yours is not important. It is. It's just your insistence the great inequality divide and the dissatisfaction of the middle and lower classes is all on dems. That's where we say you get it wrong. Two more. Though you have been given so much already, see:

Mississippi Rejection Of Obamacare Medicaid Expansion Leaves People Uninsured
2012 - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=80674358

I think i''ve read you say you are in favor of a Medicare for all. How would you get that past Republicans:

Warren Health Plan Tightens Democrats’ Embrace of Tax Increases
"I agree. I would rather that they make improvements to the Affordable Care Act and forget about Medicare for all."
P - Inequality is accepted by responsible people as one of the most pressing problems contributing to weak consumer demand
and social unrest worldwide. Her desire to address that and the relatively expensive US healthcare situation is worthy.
P - However, would her relatively radical jump in the taxation regime be politically palatable
to enough voters, in enough states, to take the electoral college from Trump?
P - A ‘Medicare for all’ proposal would push the boundaries of taxing corporations and the rich to fund expanded government programs.
2019 - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152159750

It's just not right for you to put all the problems of the struggling masses on the dems. Yet you continue to insist it is. And you are reduced to:

History is history, The transfer of wealth lead us to is where we are today, nothing more and nothing less
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=170940739

A nothing statement in that only your frame of history is the one that supports your bare bone.

Noted on the net there are many who support your proposition. Thing is ours is not that the dems need not
change at ll, it's just that your saying the inequity gap is all dems fault is not supported by the evidence.