“To be fair, I really don't think you have any evidence that Mark lacks an attorney or an auditor. It is fine to guess, but I really don't think you know or even have any evidence to back this up.”
I never said he lacks an attorney…I suggested it was possible given some of the things we have seen.
And if Mark thinks I am being unfair he can always disclose, and frankly should disclose who is service providers are.
On OTC Markets it is listed as Bevilacqua PLLC. Are they still?
And there would have been no communication with the SEC. They will simply comment on filings.
As much as some might want to dismiss the “error”…it is entirely indicative of something fundamentally wrong. I frankly can’t think of a single instance where a company decided to file a Form 10 WITHOUT ANY financials. It was a conscious choice.
And the reason it is worth more scrutiny is because of Mark’s challenged pass. This just smells every bit like when he sent that absolutely boneheaded letter to FINRA in 2015 trying to school them on “safe harbor statements”. No wonder BMA dropped the 211 like a hot potato.
It’s the same now…there is no professional advisor, consultant, provider that would have supported, let alone suggested he file a Form 10 without financials. That was ALL Mark.
He simply hasn’t changed. The shape of things to come.
"Harsh reality is always better than false hope"