Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,165.08
(
0.80%
)
US TECH 100
26,538.40
(
1.85%
)
Dow Jones
49,247.66
(
-0.13%
)
Brent Oil
100.66
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
77,798.06
(
0.42%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 867241
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Robert from yahoo bd

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 42
Posts 7171
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2020

Robert from yahoo bd

Re: Hvp123 post# 742346

Friday, 12/16/2022 6:18:13 PM

Friday, December 16, 2022 6:18:13 PM

Post# of 867241
Judge Schlitz's decision kinda takes away any monetary renumeration that future Plaintiffs will have to mount a MULTI MILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FUTURE STATUTES.

Didn't Professor Schlitz say it's about the money at Law Firms? Why wouldn't that apply to Prospective Litigants challenging federal government overreach in Acts of Congress that are deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent FNMA News
More FNMA News