REPORT ON THE BIDEN LAPTOP Another forensic analysis of the Biden Laptop was conducted by an LA-based firm named Maryman48 & Associates: “The firm’s founder, Brad Maryman, was a 29-year veteran of the FBI, served as a Chief Information Security Officer and founded the bureau’s cyber forensics unit. His partner, Dr. Joseph Greenfield, is49 an associate professor at the University of Southern California and helped write their degree program in intelligence and cyber operations.” After an extensive analysis of the hard drive, Greenfield and50 Maryman produced a high-level report which detailed their findings. A summary of the report is below: ? “They found emails for multiple accounts on the laptop dating back to 2009, and other data [that] ‘appear[] to be related to Mr. Biden’ between 2016 and 2019. ? The report’s findings were consistent with the known timeline for the hard drive. A Wilmington, Delaware computer store work order with Hunter’s signature shows he left his 2017 MacBook Pro laptop there on April 12, 2019. ? The Maryman & Associates report said the original ‘Macintosh HD’ drive was created on March 28, 2018. ? Hunter’s iCloud email address was added to the laptop’s system on October 21, 2018, as well as his work email at his firm Rosemont Seneca on February 2, 2019. ? The same day, a Gmail address he used to log onto sex cam sites, and another personal Gmail address belonging to Hunter, were also added. ? Beau Biden’s old Gmail account was added on February 7, 2019. ? Emails addressed to Hunter’s various email addresses dating from December 2009 to December 2020 were found on the system. ? An iPad with the name ‘Hunter’s iPad’ and three email addresses associated with the Biden family was backed up on the laptop and on iCloud in January 2019 and again a month later. ? Greenfield found 818 call logs in this iPad backup with timestamps from June 2016 to February 2019. ? There were 8,942 entries in the iPad's contacts book, created between April 2016 and January 2019. ? In February 2019 an iPhone XS was also synced with the laptop. Its serial number was consistent with the timestamps of the data on the phone.” In conclusion: ‘The operating system timestamps appear to be authentic, and no evidence was found to suggest that the timestamps or data were altered or manufactured ... No indications were found that would suggest the data was manufactured.’”51