Sharp himself testified to the court that the shares were registered to Calasse with the transfer agent. That is not in question. That should be proof enough to anyone.
The district court ruled against him because he didn't include any evidence in the opposition. Everything after that was ignored.
You can continue to simplify things or misrepresent them, to feel confident of success, but the reality is more nuanced.
If someone can't tell that a shell is a shell, can you trust anything else that they say?