It's more than a little difficult to understand what your point is. You think she's either protecting people or is afraid that if she gave names she'd be found dead from suicide in her jail cell? Or you think that since no one else is being prosecuted that it's all a hoax of some sort?
You've boiled this down to what I believe is referred to as, reductio ad absurdum. Regardless, if she gives names, then trials must ensue and women will have to testify against their childhood abusers.
And why do you think the trafficked girls aren't coming forward to name names, either? I'm guessing it's because many of them are now mothers and don't want to put their families through the horrors of being prosecution witnesses at sex abuse trials. So they've taken sizable payoffs and signed NDAs and who can blame them.
She's in jail, Epstein's dead, Andrew is humiliated, the girls have hopefully been amply paid, sometimes you just have to let sleeping dogs lie, even if they're rabid. Unless, of course, you're convinced this is some sort of Clinton Crime Family shenanigans, in which case you are, in fact, seriously dumb.
