Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

OOPS

I read way too fast and remember way too little and confuse easily

Looking again - I think I quoted from DEFENDANT side

Looking again ---- maybe 100% minus me understood - but this involvement of SCOTUS is not to have SCOTUS re think what THEY did

As I now read it more carefully and slowly - this is asking SCOTUS to review the Circuit Court Decision (from the claims -special - court)

WOW - did I have it misnderstood - then again - I am donotunderstan

The petition to SCOTUS is to have SCOTUS (in my words be a superior court of appeals) -- to have SCOTUS look at a decision of a court of appeals on what I call a direct set of questions --- this time I think I have our set of questions ?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. If the United States causes a company to
transfer to the United States for the public benefit
private shareholders’ rights incident to their
ownership of shares in the company, do the private
shareholders have a direct, personal interest in a
cause of action challenging that taking?
2. Were the rights to future dividends and other
distributions held by petitioners cognizable property
rights protected by the Takings Clause?
These questions are raised by petitioners in Owl
Creek Asia I, L.P., et al v. United States, No. 22-_____
(filed July 22, 2022) and Cacciapalle, et al., v. United
States, No. 22-_____ (filed July 22, 2022), which both
seek review of the same court of appeals decision.