The way I read it is the purposeful intent to drag in dems and attempting to impress upon people that dems are a problem too, a problem to themselves and then constant drum of defection away from the nazi party by soft peddling "dems are just as bad, or dems are confused, or dems won't beat some sort of manipulated poll predictions.
What I'm saying is the pundits and 'expert' pollsters are lazy and complacent with pushing the safe rhetoric. While constantly putting a negative spin on anything dem.
When one writes, what's not being written is just as important, or maybe more so than what is worded.
Like, I wonder if it's true that don jr isn't a shittypants by blood? So he's out of the will?
See, now my comment may be picked up and spread around with other comments, but the effect is done. Did I or did I not just interject some doubt about jr?
Like fucker charlatan of faux spews, he only asks 'questions' right?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
