Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,506.00
(
0.28%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
91.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
73,844.02
(
0.12%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 42723
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

boston745

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 42
Posts 22332
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/10/2015

boston745

Member Level

Re: madg post# 38604

Friday, 11/04/2022 8:42:56 PM

Friday, November 04, 2022 8:42:56 PM

Post# of 42723
You keep misinterpreting what it was said in 2017. If the IP had no future uses then it wouldnt be acquiring the IP.

So if Zimmer submitted a hip implant utilizing MC2, then it submitted Sonnys hip implant design, or at least something built off that design. Theres the IP it paid for in 2017.

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent SINT News
More SINT News