InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3504
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/11/2022

Re: nsomniyak post# 55880

Tuesday, 10/11/2022 3:42:16 PM

Tuesday, October 11, 2022 3:42:16 PM

Post# of 69215
I see your point and maybe that's why he's been such a bulldog about it, but I disagree with your conclusion.

As long as the settlement includes canceling all preferred shares, I don't see any reason why it is worse than not settling. Once they reach a settlement, Sharp can say "here is the share structure" and it won't change.

It wasn't really claims coming out the woodwork, Sharp tried to cancel shares and it was contested. Seems straight forward that had he not canceled them, there would be no appeal or ongoing headaches. If the private company doesn't care about the OS, Sharp could have just accepted the counter (instead of lowering his offer) and moved on to the merger.


First I offered Calasse 10 million shares with a caveat that I negotiate down--not up
When his lawyer countered with 25 million, I offered 8 million
When the Motion for Reconsideration was filed, I offered one million

Now he has nothing but a bunch of bad advice and legal bills




This tweet was posted on 4/28, almost six months ago. Maybe Sharp really thought that was the end of things, but with how sue happy he is I'm shocked he wouldn't expect a lengthy appeal.