Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

conix, Sod knows why Andrew P. Napolitano would gain no joy from his decision that Donald Trump
would likely finally be brought to account for some of his innumerable number of serious misdeeds.

"It gives me no joy to write this piece."

"Sod knows why" why? Because really all decent Americans should be satisfied to see Trump finally getting some of his due. Particularly a legal eagle as the judge, should be. Yes, of course it was said in sarcasm as we all know Andrew P. is not exactly known as being an exceptionally straight-up, non-partisan judge,

#1 Fox’s Judge Andrew Napolitano has said time and time again that there is ‘overwhelming’ evidence to both indict and convict Clinton. “The evidence is overwhelming to conclude, overwhelming to anyone that observed what she did,” he said.

# 2 Former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey penned a Wall Street Journal opinion piece saying that a criminal charge is, in fact, justified.

has he. His legal partisanship has known virtually no bounds.

We Fact Checked Trump’s Claim That ‘Virtually Every Single’ Legal Expert Believes Clinton Committed a Crime
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126118760

One of yours - Clinton Email Scandal: Hillary’s Legal Troubles Mount As Her Nomination Nears
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=122434966

Yes. You too are well remembered for your position on Hillary's emails.

See also:

What if Trump's conspiracy was way bigger than we know?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169830475