InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251670
Next 10
Followers 827
Posts 119535
Boards Moderated 15
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: dewophile post# 243625

Monday, 08/29/2022 4:37:03 PM

Monday, August 29, 2022 4:37:03 PM

Post# of 251670

…whether or not BMY should be taking a 5% hit on a project that was fairly high risk to begin with is another matter…

The 5% hit today is reasonable, IMO, despite the fact that I think the Milvexian program still has potential (see below).

In AF, it will be difficult for Milvexian monotherapy to show superiority to Eliquis (the likely phase-3 trial design), but I think Milvexian’s phase-3 chances will be somewhat better in the SSP and ACS indications, where Milvexian will presumably be tested as an addend to DAPT.

From your post, it sounds as though you’ve written off the Milvexian program in its entirety. My view is that Milvexian is unlikely to be an Eliquis-magnitude blockbuster, but it could yet be a material contributor.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.