News Focus
News Focus
Followers 190
Posts 61779
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: fuagf post# 416813

Thursday, 06/16/2022 6:07:27 PM

Thursday, June 16, 2022 6:07:27 PM

Post# of 575208
From your link...it should be noted who the judge was, and why faux fought to come before her court. It wasn't a luck of a draw to get a judge. mcdougle never had a chance.

Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

Vyskocil's ruling last week, dismissing a slander lawsuit filed against Carlson, was a win for Fox, First Amendment principles and the media more generally, as Fox News itself maintains. As a legal matter, the judge ruled that Karen McDougal, the woman suing Carlson, failed to surmount the challenge.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today