Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

B402, You clearly and unarguably remain sorely mistaken on this point. Pointing out instances in which false equivalence is invalid is entirely correct. In fact that's absolutely what should and must be done to debunk your overall abuse of the concept.

"Only BS is the continued use of 'false equivalence' ...How many are still uninsured? Around 28 million of mostly working class.."

You wouldn't claim cars were the same when the shape of the hood is different. Or the shape of the roof. Or the boot. Or the size of the wheels. The number of uninsured falls on the Republican party. You have just debunked your own false equivalent claim about the two parties.

"No, you consistently prove the point that no criticism of the saint dem party could possibly be true.......So one could say, whats the point of putting a decent case to you....And of course the repubs are the same....."

Wrong again. Fact is, and this has been pointed out to you before, there are many posts critical of the Democrats made by liberals on this board. You cannot yet again deny or ignore that fact. Well, ok, you could and you might deny and ignore it again. Then, you would just be wrong again.

"Love the false affiliation quip too. On cue.."

Am not sure what you are on about there. It wouldn't be important here, so won't bother looking back on it.

"Arguing about who is 'worse' another conversation........."

LOLOL On the contrary. Do you seriously not see what you have said there? If one of the parties is worse the two parties are NOT equivalent.

Sorry. You are so married to your invalid claim that the two parties are equally at fault for
all and everything wrong with the U.S.A. you have lost sight of the reality of the situation.

Your last statement there makes your problem clear.