News Focus
News Focus
Followers 69
Posts 7941
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2015

Re: shell3 post# 27239

Wednesday, 04/06/2022 1:11:38 PM

Wednesday, April 06, 2022 1:11:38 PM

Post# of 28001
I have not seen the 45 minute window you suggest regarding a window of detection. What I will say is a 45 minute window makes a THC device practically useless. You're talking about trying to catch someone who has basically smoked right next to you before going about their business. Such a radical timeline is just that - Radical. And, it would further prove Cannabix's technology is inferior and headed for a junk pile in due time. Whether the Cannabix story continues to capture those who remain clueless about what's really happening at Camp Cannabix - they'll ultimately find out it's all one big charade.

Point being, there are no scientists that believe impairment does not stretch far beyond 45 minutes of consumption. So, detecting THC (not impairment) within 45 minutes of use eliminated the vast majority of those who would be under the influence (DUID) far beyond 45 minutes. People need to simply think matters through in a practice way. A 45 minute window if detection is impractical and useless.

Of note: The science also states thc in edibles are detected in breath at a completely different rate (timeline) than smoking. If anyone actually saw the disastrous Texas Forum presentation by Dr. Boock - you would know he ducked a direct question regarding detection of THC from edibles. What's their actual timeline that begins to detect THC front edibles? Edibles could take hours to reach the breath (lungs). Impairment can last considerably longer from edibles than smoking. Many hours longer. As I've said it's all a charade and the so-called data coming from Cannabix will continue to change with the wind.

M$
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BLOZF News