Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,087.09
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
25,804.00
(
-0.26%
)
Dow Jones
49,371.86
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
93.52
(
3.13%
)
Bitcoin
75,944.09
(
0.07%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 866869
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

familymang

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 15
Posts 645
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/28/2021

familymang

Re: Letgoofmyfannie post# 715051

Friday, 03/18/2022 4:19:57 PM

Friday, March 18, 2022 4:19:57 PM

Post# of 866869
Look at my past post history and youll see my answer to that. But the gist of it is that Lamberth already ruled in his 2018 ruling even if we lost the SCOTUS APA ruling and the Takings ruling, it wouldn't dismiss our contracts claims.

Lamberth Timeline
3/21: Parties motion for summary judgement (SJ)
4/15: Parties response against SJ
5/6: Parties response in support of SJ
5/12 - 6/11: Pretrial conference
~7/10: SJ Decision
7/11: Trial Begins
~2H ’22: Trial Decision

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent FNMA News
More FNMA News