Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,230.12
(
0.29%
)
US TECH 100
26,942.00
(
0.87%
)
Dow Jones
49,499.27
(
-0.31%
)
Brent Oil
107.80
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
78,693.04
(
0.64%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 867863
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Achilles deFlandres

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 1647
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/11/2020

Achilles deFlandres

Re: Louie_Louie post# 714084

Thursday, 03/10/2022 7:15:47 AM

Thursday, March 10, 2022 7:15:47 AM

Post# of 867863
The argument against the letter as I understand it won't wash partially because Sweeney abandoned a criteria she stated maybe 7yrs ago "at behest of treasury". Apparantly this test for takings has been avoided because of the dismissal AND has been flipped because "Trump could have ordered Treasury regardless of who the FHFA director was" to support government arguments. It seems like the government gets it both ways.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent FNMA News
More FNMA News