Wednesday, March 09, 2022 4:01:51 PM
Correct I do not believe the recent takings ruling changed the precedent set by Lamberth. As Lamberth explained himself in his opinion, the takings ruling is vs a different set of expectations against the government itself, while the IMPLIED COVENANT claim (differentiated from other contract claims that were dismissed already) is a different set of expectations against the GSEs themselves.
GSEs Litigation 2022
1) Lambert breach of contracts case: Trial July 22, Decision expected 2H' 22
2/3/4) Collins/Rop/Bhatti unconstitutional remedy cases: Decision(s) expected 2H '22
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Reports Net Income of $3.7 Billion for First Quarter 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/29/2026 11:24:00 AM
- Fannie Mae Releases March 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 04/28/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Plans to Report First Quarter 2026 Financial Results on April 29, 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/27/2026 12:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
