but don't hold your position and cripple the company at the same time
I've weighed it out and IMO, allowing the possibility of doubling the outstanding shares is much more crippling to the company in the long and short term than trying to force management to forgo the 17 million shares. What FG is doing may hurt a little in the short term , but we'll all be better off in the future. from what I understand, FG's action would not require a typical 2 or 3 year action in a civil court. The allegations are made by a shareholder claiming certain violations. The company responds in a short time period and the judge makes a ruling. Maybe 6 months with a temporary injunction in place pending a ruling. The info I'm have is from another state and from what I understand is Floridas' laws are more condusive to minority shareholders than most states.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
