Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

entering mid conversation

without context

but the below ?

At $8 bucks with 80% dilution, the government could net another $13B or so.

If the gov wants to take or does take our current 100% ownership down to 20% - with them owning 80% --- I see no reason that cannot be 25 a share

depends on the SP LP

If Gov decides that collecting the SP back - via cash or future earnings or some form of crazy (Bradford numbers are beyond the pale) number of shares and then reverse (to give them a lot and kill us) -- is NOT a good idea (20 more years of suits and exposure not needed)

but the GOV decides it wants money FAST ---- IMO (without full knowledge of every document and agreement involved) -- it seems the GOV can easily get 25 a share for 4B shares if it caps total shares at 5B

Requires a reduction of size in NEEDED capital at the git go - but the GOV could require F and F to husband money and not pay any dividends until it hits say half the current level MC the bastard put on us

Why sell 4B shares at 8 when they can sell them at 25 (all related to SP which I argue = maybe = the GOV decides to wipe SO THAT they can get a fast 100B