| Followers | 65 |
| Posts | 29982 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 12/28/2008 |
Wednesday, December 29, 2021 11:44:52 AM
I agree but
I prefer to say that the NWS was changed --- because the obligation was not stopped. Sorry - but when cash stays in one pocket but IOUs grow in the other pocket - by accounting rules you are no richer as a company
Now - I too hope that some settlement comes along - for whatever reason (politics - courts - common sense and about time) --- and the GOV says for monies paid by F and F the entire LP - SP value is taken down to zero !!
In that case - which could well happen - then those IOUs are wiped out as if they never were written
But if I think of a loan or a mortgage --- if the bank says --- go keep the cash - do not send it to us - but each month we will increase the amount you owe us the that same amount ---- no way would I consider that mortgage stopped !! (And if I owed interest on that growth in principal owed? And its at 10% --- ?)
So I prefer this arrangement - cash stays and IOU is written
but no way does this arrangement - what I call smoke and mirrors - stop the NWS or SWEEP
Again - if GOV wants it can collect on those IOUs - it just can
Again - I too hope that such added levels to the LP are wiped out along with all of the LP and we win and THEN (but only then) IMO did we win by this arrangement
Not an accountant
I prefer to say that the NWS was changed --- because the obligation was not stopped. Sorry - but when cash stays in one pocket but IOUs grow in the other pocket - by accounting rules you are no richer as a company
Now - I too hope that some settlement comes along - for whatever reason (politics - courts - common sense and about time) --- and the GOV says for monies paid by F and F the entire LP - SP value is taken down to zero !!
In that case - which could well happen - then those IOUs are wiped out as if they never were written
But if I think of a loan or a mortgage --- if the bank says --- go keep the cash - do not send it to us - but each month we will increase the amount you owe us the that same amount ---- no way would I consider that mortgage stopped !! (And if I owed interest on that growth in principal owed? And its at 10% --- ?)
So I prefer this arrangement - cash stays and IOU is written
but no way does this arrangement - what I call smoke and mirrors - stop the NWS or SWEEP
Again - if GOV wants it can collect on those IOUs - it just can
Again - I too hope that such added levels to the LP are wiped out along with all of the LP and we win and THEN (but only then) IMO did we win by this arrangement
Not an accountant
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Announces Sale of Reperforming Loans • PR Newswire (US) • 05/28/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases April 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 05/27/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Reports Net Income of $3.7 Billion for First Quarter 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/29/2026 11:24:00 AM
- Fannie Mae Releases March 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 04/28/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Plans to Report First Quarter 2026 Financial Results on April 29, 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/27/2026 12:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
