InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 438
Posts 45331
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 05/11/2008

Re: None

Tuesday, 12/21/2021 3:19:46 PM

Tuesday, December 21, 2021 3:19:46 PM

Post# of 22967
Netlist vs Samsung New Patent Infringement Case in Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division. Jason Sheasby is Lead!! It's in Marshall Texas so this looks like the Judge is Rodney Gilstrap Chief District Judge. He has issued enhanced damages against a defendant in the past (Willful Infringement)

https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AGaJwmThhgEIMhA&id=658845AE0CC93963%2187033&cid=658845AE0CC93963

This suit is in regard to the 506, 339, and 918 Patents. Links to documents below.

All have the following point in the complaint- Samsung had knowledge of the ’339 Patent no later than August 2, 2021 via its access to Netlist’s patent portfolio docket.

What Netlist is asking for?

WHEREFORE, Netlist respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in its favor ordering, finding, declaring, and/or awarding Netlist relief as follows:

A. that Samsung infringes the Patents-in-Suit;

B. all equitable relief the Court deems just and proper as a result of Samsung’s infringement;

C. an award of damages resulting from Samsung’s acts of infringement in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284;

D. that Samsung’s infringement of the Patents-in-Suit is willful;

E. enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;

F. that this is an exceptional case and awarding Netlist its reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;

G. an accounting for acts of infringement and supplemental damages, without limitation, prejudgment and post-judgment interest; and

H. such other equitable relief which may be requested and to which Netlist is entitled.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NLST/comments/rlhmne/netlist_vs_samsung_new_patent_infringement_case/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NLST News