InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 43
Posts 5751
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/12/2021

Re: None

Thursday, 12/09/2021 7:20:45 AM

Thursday, December 09, 2021 7:20:45 AM

Post# of 107
“ Litigation

From time to time the Company is subject to claims by third parties under various legal disputes. The defense of such claims, or any adverse outcome relating to any such claims, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

On March 12, 2021, the Company and Mr. Mack (the “Defendants”) were named as defendants in a complaint (the “Complaint”) filed by Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. (“Sorrento”), and Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Scilex” and together with Sorrento, the “Plaintiffs”) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. In the Complaint, the Plaintiffs alleged (i) Mr. Mack breached a Restrictive Covenants Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, between himself and Sorrento (the “Restrictive Covenants Agreement”), (ii) the Company tortiously interfered with the Restrictive Covenants Agreement, and (iii) the Company tortiously interfered with Scilex’s relationship with Mr. Mack. On May 7, 2021 Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (the “First Amended Complaint”) asserting the same three causes of action. Simultaneously with filing the original Complaint, Plaintiffs filed a motion to expedite, seeking a hearing on their prospective motion for a preliminary injunction, prohibiting Mr. Mack’s alleged violations of the Restrictive Covenants Agreement and prohibiting the alleged tortious interference. On March 22, 2021, Vice Chancellor Paul A. Fioravanti Jr. issued a scheduling order, setting forth terms which had been agreed to by the parties, under which oral argument on Plaintiffs’ proposed motion for preliminary injunction was scheduled for July 15, 2021. On May 18, 2021, the Vice Chancellor issued a revised scheduling order, also setting forth terms which had been agreed to by the parties, under which Plaintiffs agreed not to move for a preliminary injunction and a trial in the action was set for February 9-11, 2022. On September 28, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Verified Complaint asserting the same three causes of action as the prior complaints, as well as additional claims in which Plaintiffs allege (i) Mr. Mack breached an Employment, Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, between himself and Sorrento (the “Employment Agreement”), (ii) the Company tortiously interfered with the Employment Agreement, (iii) Mr. Mack breached his fiduciary duties to Scilex, and (iv) the Company aided and abetted Mr. Mack’s alleged breach of fiduciary duties to Scilex. On October 18, 2021, Defendants filed an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint, and subsequently withdrew a previously filed motion to dismiss the first Amended Complaint. We intend to vigorously defend the action. However, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the lawsuit at this time.


- From the quarterly filing

my posts are always theory and not financial advice

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VRPX News