News Focus
News Focus
Followers 3
Posts 195
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2021

Re: None

Thursday, 12/09/2021 3:56:10 AM

Thursday, December 09, 2021 3:56:10 AM

Post# of 2382000
$CYAP should be .10 cents

It would be cheaper for EMA to buy back the shares then spend 100k in legal fees and risk loosing and shutting down there business if they dont have EO Insurance but this is just my opinion . Attorneys should just go to mediation and end it

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.



Subsequent to the fiscal period, we commenced legal action against EMA Financial, LLC’s (“EMA”) in Nevada District Court for breach of contract claims relating to a share purchase agreement and corresponding convertible promissory note.



In March 2021, we attempted to prepay EMA’s convertible promissory note for the premium stipulated in the note, but EMA, relying on a most favored nation clause, took the position that the payout amount was significantly higher than the amount that we believed was due. Our legal counsel put EMA on notice that we disputed the prepayment amount due pursuant to the note.



On April 6, 2021, EMA provided us and our transfer agent with a notice of conversion whereby it instructed the transfer agent to convert the entire principal amount of the note, plus interest, for 1,281,682 of our shares. Because the note contains a clause that allows EMA to cancel the conversion if the shares are not issued within one business day of the conversion notice, EMA canceled the conversion on April 8 following the decline in our stock price. The transfer agent advised us that it could not issue the converted shares by the one business day deadline because EMA did not provide it with the necessary documentation to effect the conversion and issue the shares.



EMA provided successive conversion notices to us and our transfer agent, which resulted in EMA being issued 18,369,800 shares of our common stock. Through its sales of this stock, our share price declined from by over 90% from $0.102 on April 6, 2021, to $0.009 on May 23, 2021.



We were ready, willing, and able to prepay EMA’s note for the amount originally stated in the note by the prepayment deadline date and suffered damages due to EMA’s failure to accept that prepayment. Moreover, we allege that EMA acted in bad faith by providing notice of conversion of its note to its transfer agent and then failing to provide the transfer agent with the documentation necessary to effect the conversion so that it could withdraw the conversion if our stock price subsequently fell or proceed with the conversion if the stock value increased or remained stable.



We are seeking damages of $15,256,438 for its decrease in market capitalization due to the wrongful actions of EMA, as well as punitive and other damages

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today