News Focus
News Focus
Followers 616
Posts 27445
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 11/16/2007

Re: Jitz post# 383691

Thursday, 11/11/2021 4:26:28 PM

Thursday, November 11, 2021 4:26:28 PM

Post# of 405172
Yes, 120 patients may have been treated. But, 1/2 of them would have been treated with placebo and the other half with Brilacidin.

Brinjal Thursday, 11/11/21 12:47:31 PM
Re: Jitz post# 383679 0 Post # of 383778

The Brilacidin arm and the placebo arm had 60 patients each. 2/3rd (40 patients) in the Brilacidin arm received a 5-day course, and 1/3rd (20 patients) a 3-day course (this was announced previously). 4 in the Brilacidin arm died, and ditto in the placebo arm. That's the reason for the conclusion that there was no change in mortality.

The way the PR is worded is a little confusing.








Message in reply to:
What you are saying makes sense for no showing any effect but doesn't line up with pr. Still struggling with:
..the trial, 120 patients were treated, with THREE-FOURTHS receiving 5(FIVE) days of study drug"

3/4 of 120 =90



The many give their power to the few in the form of acquiescence.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y