Sunday, October 24, 2021 12:40:39 PM
It’s not a “coordinated attack”. And if it were, why not just concede to disclosing active users in each Q? Why give the “FUDsters” ammunition? If active user numbers are good, then that’s one less thing people can criticize. It would support the idea that this platform is gaining interest.
So why not disclose it?
Because there are probably something like 200 active users. That’s embarrassingly low. Truly humiliating for everyone involved. That’s why, instead of answering the question, you label it a “coordinated attack” and a “combative question”. That way you can dismiss it and avoid facing this evidence of failure.
So why not disclose it?
Because there are probably something like 200 active users. That’s embarrassingly low. Truly humiliating for everyone involved. That’s why, instead of answering the question, you label it a “coordinated attack” and a “combative question”. That way you can dismiss it and avoid facing this evidence of failure.
Recent TTCM News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/20/2026 09:37:06 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/28/2026 02:57:28 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/28/2025 05:07:43 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 09:27:39 PM
