As I mentioned, Tim Pagliara has "skin in the game".
While I can not verify that Tim Pagliara did or did not mention the sale of warrants to third parties, its entirely possible, or even likely, this was "bait", if, indeed, this happened.
Remember, Tim Pagliara, has vast experience in law, being an attorney himself. So, for example, maybe, just maybe, Tim knew that the government offering the warrants for sale to a third party would be a legal nightmare -disaster senario, that could well ensure victory for shareholders.
Apparently, the government did not "take the bait", but, in chess its best to leave many ways for your opponent to go wrong. This could well be still another way for the government to go wrong, and hang themselves.
It would not be the first time sharp attorney's have offered some suggestions, that, if accepted, would provide a highly favorable outcome for their client (that is, shareholders).
Since Im not a legal expert, I can not explain how this could happen, but I have great confidence in Pagliara, and sometimes its about trust.
We go to the doctor, he tells us to take pills, and we often do..even if we dont know why.
Millions of people got the vaccine. Powell took both vaccine shots and died of covid. Were the doctors telling us the truth? We dont know, but sometimes I wonder.
It makes zero sense to assume Wiseman's "hate" theory, and assume Pagliara own thousands of shares only to advocate against shareholders.
A more likely senario is that we are ignorant of the legal implications of the government trying to sell the warrants, and Pagliara knows better than we do.
Market Data 
Markets 
