News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 827
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/16/2016

Re: Raider21 post# 65661

Friday, 10/15/2021 1:33:41 PM

Friday, October 15, 2021 1:33:41 PM

Post# of 80010
Of course.

We already have one huge wreck in the ring site. Why don't you think the state has let us dive there in over a year? And please don't answer something dumb like flotsam because you know that is B.S.!Plus the site plan is super impressive. I am sure your buddy has a copy. Have him post it. So you can read it yourself.

I personally believe there is a huge wreck in Juno. Btw it's harder to dive there because it's so deep. I believe the divers have to use nitrox. So just digging random holes 80-90 feet down is why no one has found anything. You need something like the sea searcher that will identify gold/silver ect..and pinpoint it's location. That has not been done or is being done as we speak.

Why shouldn't there be a wreck in the HTQ site. We have found lots of flotsam already. We have been following that trail. Albeit before the sea searcher we think we were headed in the wrong direction. That ship wreck is scattered everywhere. Unlike the one in the ring site.

That is why Kyle may say things like we will never be able to identify certain ships because how would you? Find a board that says here lies the remains of the conception...lol. seriously guys. That is ridiculous.

In my opinion. It's to SFRX benefit to never identify the ship anyway because then how would any country take claim to a unidentified ship?

Like I said before.

SFRX is a technology company first then a treasure company second.

Go big or go home

Go sfrx
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News