Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[FOFreddie]

Isn't the Kelly suit Direct and/or Derivative?

This is paragraph 120 - isn't this a Direct claim?

120. Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to just compensation for the Government’s taking
of their property and/or illegal exaction in an amount to be determined at trial.

Thanks for the reply but wanted to point out the discrepancy.

Regarding the Statute of Limitations - am I correct that Kelly and Wash. Federal have the same law firm. I am speculating that Kelly wanted to wait and see the Collins decision before spending the money?

Dont you think it is unlikely that Kelly would have waited so long if they did not think the Statute of Limitations tolled?

Dont you think Collins actually makes Kelly's claim stronger if it gets beyond the Statute of Limitations.?

Thanks again for all your insight and time.