Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[sox040713]

I'm not debating whether naked shorting exists or doesn't exist in IPIX. Since you guarantee it has happened, please show when and how many shares backed by creditable sources.

Someone mentioned a recent lawsuit on naked shorting. I haven't read it, but logic would suggest that the plaintiff's lawyer should have some creditable evidence to support their claim. If Leo's lawyer goes to court and argues that because naked shorting exists and has happened to other companies, therefore it must have happened to IPIX, they will be laughed out of the court.

If lawyers of other companies found evidence of naked shorting, why can't Leo hire a lawyer to do the same? If it really exists in IPIX, Leo could win and receive a big compensation.

We know it has been done in the past, guaranteed, so what’s the logical thought for present situation.