Interesting how many don't understand the format, temper, and purpose of scientific papers. With the scientific method, most scientists (doctors are actually scientists of sorts also) make interventions and observations. They don't control 100% of the process because there are too many external and uncontrollable influences - it's just a fact of the world we live in.
You can think it as their educated observations. That's why people rely upon well educated and experienced scientists to further our knowledge of our surroundings. The quest for knowledge is what separates us from smooth brained apes.
So, when scientists document their actions, interventions, and observations there is always a VERY remote chance that something that they didn't take into account was a contributing factor. However, when multiple scientists in multiple locations take a previously documented study and attempt to replicate it...to either reinforce the findings or refute them....This is part of the "peer review" process which helps steer if something is worthy of pursuing or it's unrepeatable and not valid.
As far as my readings of hundreds of scientific papers that deal with the immune system and how it relates to leronlimab, I find recurring themes - that the drug shows significant and newfound treatment possibilities. We are literally watching the evolutionary discovery of treatments that will revolutionize medicine as we've known it. But I'd offer to say that I am a mere novice compared to CTMedic and Ohm20's understanding and comprehension level.
And for those challenged in understanding and patience there's this.....
TL;DR: Everyone needs to brush up on legal understanding of someone’s opinion and the fact that statements made in a scientific publication can’t be opinions. We'll leave that for anonymous message boards and Op-Eds.
New NP hit!!
Short, you're a boy, make a big noise
Playing in the street, wanna be a big man someday
We will, we will SHOCK you!!
We will, we will SHOCK you!!
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
