Data443 Risk Mitigation Inc (ATDS)

[Bubae]

They are way overdue for their weekly PR. Even the lame PRs sell at least some shares. Waiting for the big bomb to drop with the details of the Centurion Technologies acquisition. We all know that won't be the last. Same game, different group of of shareholders and Jason has shares to burn again at this point.

I do get that the OTC is the wild west were buyer beware is the rule. It would seem to me that the OTC would demand that a company maintain at least a basic level of decorum regarding their shareholders rather than condoning what appears to be outright theft. To date Data433 has simply sold shares through repeated deceptions that they intend to return value to the shareholder in my opinion.

The huge sum paid for DataExpress is an example. They still owe them money and is the subject of the current lawsuit.

https://sec.report/Document/0001493152-21-018448/

"We recently received a complaint filed against Data443 Risk Mitigation, Inc., a North Carolina corporation and the wholly subsidiary of the Company (the “Subsidiary”), by DMBGROUP, LLC (“DMB”). The action was filed in County Court in Denton County, Texas, and arises out of the purchase by the Subsidiary of assets of DMB, for which the Subsidiary issued to DMB its promissory note (the “Note”). DMB claims that the Subsidiary is delinquent on its payments under the Note and is therefore in default under the Note. While the Subsidiary is late in making payments under the Note, the Company believes that there are a number of significant issues affecting the amounts due under the Note and that the Subsidiary is justified in withholding payments under the Note. While this action has just been commenced, we intend to vigorously dispute all claims asserted by DMB."



"The Company views most legal proceedings involving claims of former employees as routine litigation incidental to the business, and therefore not material. The Company is currently involved in two such matters with former employees. One matter involves three former employees; the other matter involves one former employee. In each matter, the former employee is seeking additional compensation. In response, the Company believes that in each matter the former employee was terminated “for cause” and is owed no further consideration or compensation. The Company intends to vigorously dispute each such claim."