Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

My main point here is that the USCFC has not been asked to rule whether or not a nationalization has occurred. They are just being asked to determine if the government has taken actions that require a payment to shareholders or the companies, and if so, in what amount.


And event that was not put to the court !!!!!

No nationalization in the official stuff (maybe oral)

and as I read the ANSWER from the court - they answered a question far thinner and smaller than the above

The court (SCOTUS here) was asked if a SPECIFIC singular action violated the APA ----- and would thus require compensation

A VERY NARROW SPECIFICE QUESTION

now the court did says - Scotus - that FHFA via HERA has some crazy large insane powers ---- but the question - as I understood it - was very focused on the NWS and on the APA ???? and only there did we lose (again - we lost given the broad powers that ALITO gave to the FHFA since he is a socialist and liberal (just pointing out with sarcasm that the action of this strong conservative small government judge was to give GOV agency to do all types of wrong and ugly stuff !!!!!!!