Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Homebrew, The medical world overwhelmingly says there is no high quality data to date which would justify CDC approval of ivermectin as a treatment for Covid. The studies most relied on so far by those pushing for approval have all been under the microscope, as all good scientific research is, and each for various reasons have come up wanting. Undeclared conflicts of interest evidence, unreliable data and suggestions of plagiarism included. That's pretty well a simple answer to your

"Curious what the medical world makes of it. Pro & Con."

which in itself suggests you haven't done as much reading o hsve. LOL That comment of yours is way off beam.

In case there is anything in these two you aren't aware of

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165670890

What to know about a pro-ivermectin group’s study touting the drug versus COVID-19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165644656

Toss in a third

Bar association serves legal notice to WHO chief scientist over Ivermectin guidelines
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165672232

And others fore and aft of the above, for more.

In one of those articles it says "the jury is still out" on ivermectin as a covid treatment. Well the jury is still out on whether or not Trump was the worst president America has had too.

Oh, also: The company that produces ivermectin has said themselves that there is no good evidence to support considering that drug should be used as a covid treatment. That's those articles somewhere. Aw, one more

February 4, 2021 11:45 am ET

KENILWORTH, N.J., Feb. 4, 2021 – Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:

* No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;

* No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;

* A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.

We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

All that and all the other info given to you earlier by those you have labeled as MAGA-like should have your rethinking your

"Curious what the medical world makes of it. Pro & Con."

At this stage, seems for me, that comment by Merck should be enough for anybody.

This was my original reaction to your first smear post

It's not a smear against Ivermectin it's a smear against the idiots who are getting their doses from Horse paste or Sheep Drench at their feed store.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165675807 .. and blackhawks' too i've seen.

See also:

Column: A letter from a horse: Please stop taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19. That’s our medicine, you ninnies.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165676316