News Focus
News Focus
Followers 109
Posts 11523
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2006

Re: DesertDrifter post# 383824

Sunday, 08/29/2021 4:57:23 PM

Sunday, August 29, 2021 4:57:23 PM

Post# of 575586

Rationale
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.14,15 Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.16-19 Subcutaneous administration of ivermectin 400 µg/kg had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in hamsters. However, there was a reduction in olfactory deficit (measured using a food-finding test) and a reduction in the interleukin (IL)-6:IL-10 ratio in lung tissues.20


Good thing all the would-be-Doctor-school internet aficionados embracing this are only taking (and being hospitalized for) 10X the uptake amount, as opposed to 100X as science said would be beneficial, only if you lived.

This was the most positive published study I could find.

Entire study published here

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/

Purveyors of bullshit, post your evidence. That means no op-eds or conspiracy site fodder.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today