As this continues to trade at 1.2 cents, which is right around where it was trading prior to that recent huge sale going through, I remain convinced that one seller was responsible for the huge dip. Unknown is whether they listed all its shares at market, or if they chose a limit price of 0.0014, and missed a decimal point! Either way, that's an irresponsible method of trading especially given that there was no news that would have precipitated any such a sudden 90% drop in share price. But I guess some institutions have money to burn, or else really wanted to write this off.
