AI
Tuesday, July 20, 2021 7:08:16 PM
That's exactly what my train of thought was in my previous post. It would get challenged though because of the illegal way the warrants were attained and the stated purpose. They could prevent a cluster of court case headache on using the warrants if they cut shareholders a special dividend or buy us out at a fair price.
I bank on their greed, so yes! Absolutely! let them try to exercise the warrants. Obviously they won't do it at todays prices. Knowing their greed has no bounds they would exercise probably over years to suck out the most value. So jump on those coat tails for sure.
My investment in the twins has always been based on 2 facts that are ingrained in DC. They are greedy low lifes and they hate letting anyone but themselves getting rich on legislation. Hence the constant banshee cry of not letting hedge funds get rich (mostly prefs) but okay with stealing for the benefit of taxpayers
This would be the exercise of the warrants (commons), which are more heavily owned by mutual funds and private owners.
All JMHO
I bank on their greed, so yes! Absolutely! let them try to exercise the warrants. Obviously they won't do it at todays prices. Knowing their greed has no bounds they would exercise probably over years to suck out the most value. So jump on those coat tails for sure.
My investment in the twins has always been based on 2 facts that are ingrained in DC. They are greedy low lifes and they hate letting anyone but themselves getting rich on legislation. Hence the constant banshee cry of not letting hedge funds get rich (mostly prefs) but okay with stealing for the benefit of taxpayers
This would be the exercise of the warrants (commons), which are more heavily owned by mutual funds and private owners.
All JMHO
