No one is banned!

[fuagf]

JImLur, Typically from you that article is chock full of misinformation. For one it's

"The Democrats’ past is coming back to haunt them.

They spent four years screaming “Russia!” over and over again, despite all of the facts and the evidence obviously disproving their claims.

A newly released email from Comey to James Clapper show that Comey knew that none of the information in the Steele Dossier, which was used as the basis for the Russia Collusion Hoax, could be verified."

clearly suggests to the uninformed reader that Comey was a Democrat whereas "most of his working life" he was a registered Republican .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey .

For two the second line is unequivocally an outright lie. In fact all of the facts and evidence did not disprove Democrat claims. Most all Democrat claims were supported by the evidence.

That sentence of your article is a good example of the many unsupported assertions typically posted on Tornado Alley by you conservative trolls. See

Indeed...

SENATE COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY ENDORSES SPY AGENCIES' FINDING THAT RUSSIA INTERFERED IN 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE IN BID TO HELP TRUMP
By Ellen Nakashima
April 21, 2020 at 1:49 p.m. EDT
The Senate Intelligence Committee has unanimously endorsed the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia conducted a sweeping and unprecedented campaign to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.
P - The heavily-redacted report, based on a three-year investigation, builds on a committee finding nearly two years ago that the January 2017 intelligence community assessment (ICA) on Russia was sound. The spy agencies also found that Russia sought to shake faith in American democracy, denigrate then-candidate Hillary Clinton and boost her rival Donald Trump.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=155183922

For three the "none of the information in the Steele Dossier, which was used as the basis for the Russia Collusion Hoax, could be verified." is all bullshit.

The dossier was not used as the basis of the investigation into the Russian election interference.

Dossier Not What ‘Started All of This’
By Lori Robertson
Posted on March 27, 2019
In an interview about the special counsel’s report, Rep. John Ratcliffe said that what “started all of this” was “a fake, phony dossier.” But a House Republican intelligence committee memo said it was information about a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser that sparked the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Russian interference in the election.
[...]
But Ratcliffe is wrong to say the dossier “started all of this.” Competing memos from the Republicans and the Democrats on the House intelligence committee both say that information about George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, had prompted the FBI investigation in July 2016.
P - Papadopoulos had contacts with Russian intermediaries during the campaign, according to the Justice Department, and later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about those contacts. While he was a Trump campaign adviser, Papadopoulos met with a professor with connections to Russian government officials who told him “about the Russians possessing ‘dirt’ on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of ‘thousands of emails,'” and he tried to arrange a meeting between the Russian government and the campaign, the DOJ’s statement of the offense said.
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/03/dossier-not-what-started-all-of-this/

And certainly more than "none" of that RAW INTELLIGENCE from Steele was verified. See

Explaining Republicans' claims about 'false information' in the Trump-Russia dossier
CNN Digital Expansion DC Marshall Cohen
Analysis by Marshall Cohen, CNN
Updated 1556 GMT (2356 HKT) June 14, 2019
[...]
What was corroborated?
No public evidence has emerged to support the allegation that Page colluded with the Russian government or was sent to Russia by the Trump campaign to coordinate on the election.
There is no proof Page met with Sechin, and Page has denied it.
But under questioning by the House Intelligence Committee, Page admitted that he met a different Rosneft official during the trip: Andrey Baranov, Rosneft's head of investor relations. He said he didn't recall any conversation about sanctions. But the Mueller report said they did talk about the planned sale of a stake in Rosneft, which was mentioned in the dossier.
Page denied ever meeting Divyekin, and there's no proof that Page discussed "kompromat" with anyone in Russia. But during his closed-door congressional testimony, Page acknowledged that he also had a conversation with Arkady Dvorkovich, a deputy Prime Minister.
Some of the details in the dossier were wrong. But Steele was right that Page attended high-level meetings with Russians during his trip, even though Page was denying it at the time.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/06/14/politics/trump-russia-dossier-carter-page-fisa/index.html

Moving to Clinesmith how silly is this sentence

"Clinesmith pled guilty to the charges, and was somehow only given one year’s probation and 400 hours of community service, instead of the jail time that he deserved."

Somehow??? Of course none of your readers would be interested in how the judge arrived at his position in that case, but fuck you here it is

Ex-F.B.I. Lawyer Who Altered Email in Russia Case Is Sentenced to Probation
A judge rebuffed a request by prosecutors to impose a prison sentence on Kevin Clinesmith, who admitted doctoring an email used to help authorize a wiretap on a former Trump campaign aide.
[...]
The surveillance of the former aide, Carter Page, in 2016 and 2017 was a minor part of the overall Russia investigation. But it has become a political flash point because the Justice Department’s inspector general uncovered numerous errors and omissions in its four court applications, flaws that President Donald J. Trump and his allies used as fodder in portraying the Russia inquiry as a plot by the so-called deep state.
P - Mr. Clinesmith’s misdeed was the most egregious of the problems uncovered by the inspector general. In June 2017, as the F.B.I. was preparing to seek the final renewal of the order, an F.B.I. official who was going to sign a sworn description of the facts asked Mr. Clinesmith to seek clarity from the C.I.A. about whether Mr. Page was a source for the agency, as he had claimed.
[...]
When Mr. Clinesmith pleaded guilty last year to making a false statement, he acknowledged that he had intentionally altered the email and created a false record. But he also claimed that he did not intentionally mislead his colleague because at the time he believed the words he inserted were accurate. He had separately told his colleague by text that Mr. Page was not a C.I.A. source, but rather a subsource of someone else who had talked to the agency.
P - In arguing for prison time on Friday, prosecutors suggested that Mr. Clinesmith’s explanation made no sense and that he must also have known he was misleading his colleagues, pointing to evidence that he wanted to avoid the F.B.I. having to explain to the court why it had omitted that fact of Mr. Page’s help to the C.I.A. from all the applications.
P - But Judge Boasberg said that based on the record, he believed Mr. Clinesmith’s version.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-probation.html

In short your article titled "Bombshell Email Evidence Surfaces About Comey and the FBI" is full of typical disingenuous conservative misinformation.

All of it designed to misinform and mislead you.