Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[Justfactsmam]

STATEMENT MADE:

"For better or worse IPIX designed and the FDA approved the trial to include patient status at day 60 for all participants.
I believe (which counts for damn little) that that needs to be adhered to unless..."

INCORRECT STATEMENT: Provide proof that 60-day hold for review of patient status was in Brilacidin-Covid-19 Trial Protocol. IT WASN'T. It was imposed by the FDA across the board...AFTER Brilacidn trials were approved. (acknowledged in a previous post)

________________________________________________________________________

Regarding IPIX and a potential "Deal" ...

A sale and transfer of the Brilacidin IP as well as licensing...has absolutely nothing to do with the number of employees or medical/scientific experience of those with authority to transfer.

An Acquiror of all the IP (total acquisition of the asset, i.e. IP) or Licensee (an acquiring of a specific and limited right in time or scope to use that IP)... do their DD on the science...and regulatory filings to assure themselves and their shareholders that they are acquiring the asset they intend.

With IPIX...THEY ARE NOT GOING TO ACQUIRE THE COMPANY with its EMPLOYEES... This will be an intellectual property sale or license agreement(s).

Advocating or suggesting "Partnership"...IMO is are not even close to reality. "Partnership" is not the fate of IPIX...sale or licensing of IP is. Suggesting "Partnership" is going down the wrong "Wabbit-hole"!

A Corporate Board of a company acquiring could give a "rats ass" about who is putting his or her signature to the document transferring the IP. As long as the corp. the officer has the authority (like Board and in some cases the Shareholders) ... that, after confirming via its DD, is the only function of the Corp. Officer.

Of course, Leo's press releases are not germane to DD. Acquiror NEVER makes its decision on acquiring in whole or licensing upon what the company or its officers have represented...they depend and solely rely upon their OWN team to confirm what has been represented not only by officers of the selling company, but regulators and scientific data received. In fact, specific language in the Asset Purchase agreement will reference that the "Acquiror/Purchaser has NOT RELIED UPON THE TRANSFEROR'S Representations and represents that the Acquiror has relied solely upon its own DD".

It's ALL ABOUT PROVING OUT THE SCIENCE...(Thank You Dr. DeGrado!)

_______________________________________________________________________

Even Medical Doctors and Scientists who ADVOCATE for NON-mRNA VACCINES are getting censored!


Dr. Malone Linkedin Account has been deleted. This sets the stage for "Censorship by Social Media" entering the courts...and hopefully, go up to the Supreme Court! It's about time!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/linkedin-deletes-account-of-mrna-vaccine-pioneer-who-issued-warning-about-risks_3884669.html?utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2021-07-03&mktids=157f27e3673200bb086dbac1231cc321&est=qrPg3wuTBofcjHz7oY1rYgOgdxT%2Fzv1D%2FqR8Lbywe6Kxy%2FZWmrPMUyRIsQdLMAec1ck%3D

This sets the stage for "Censorship by Social Media" entering the courts...and hopefully, going up to the Supreme Court! It's about time!

With all this Censorship...IMO...there is NO INFORMED CONSENT and vaccine recipients were not equipped to conduct verification because the ALL OF THE FACTS were and are not presented, and are, in fact, selectively CENSORED (as was done now with Dr.Malone) to produce a false "consensus".

YES, IMO...they are denied "full airing of facts" via CENSORSHIP...but there are a few in and out of the medical field having the courage to present the facts and dangers hidden by those who are supposed to know better and protect the public.

WE CAN ONLY HOPE THE OUTCOME OF BRILACIDIN TRIALS ARE NOT ALSO SELECTIVELY CENSORED...as in mRNA vaccine results...
(Russia to the rescue!...which IMO will likely include testing with variants!)

The 3 Hour Dr. Bret Weinstein (with colleagues) Youtube video concerning a discussion and verification of the potentially lethal effects of the "SPIKE PROTEIN" from the mRNA vaccinations was taken down (Censored)...by Youtube. IMO...just more CENSORSHIP by media playing along with those hiding the facts.

Author ADVOCATES for NON-mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines...ALL 3-panel members AGREE "SPIKE PROTEIN", a toxin, IS RELEASED via mRNA vaccines throughout the body. FDA / CDC pretends to be clueless about the release and consequences.

The "white paper" upon which the Youtube video was centered is attached:

https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/

The above link (Concern #25) cites HEART INFLAMMATION as a serious adverse event...in some

Attached is a 15-minute Youtube video, intro summary of the discussion between Dr. Bret Weinstein, Dr. Malone (Developer of mRNA Vaccine) and Steve Kirsch. (the 3 hr version was censored)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY[color=red][/color]

Dr. Malone IS THE INVENTOR OF THE mRNA Vaccine...and agrees, the evidence is incontrovertible ... these COVID-19 vaccines are Toxic and can be very deadly.

Steve Kirsch's Report, which all 3 agree is fact-based, supported, and verified concludes:

"Based on what I now know about the minuscule vaccine benefits (less than a .5% reduction in absolute risk), side effects (including death), current COVID rates, and the success rate of early treatment protocols, the answer I would give today to anyone asking me for advice as to whether to take any of the current vaccines would be, “Just say NO.” Waiting for Novavax (and other traditional vaccines) is a much safer option. If you get COVID in the meantime, treating with early treatment protocols that incorporate fluvoxamine and ivermectin is vastly superior to getting the most dangerous vaccine in the last 30 years."

ps. The above "white paper" offers evidence (trials) that Ivermectin is effective in pre-moderate to severe Covid-19 only. (Refuted by FDA and CDC WITHOUT FACTS or STUDY). Brilacidin Trials importance is unaffected...since Ivermectin is not effective against the Covid-19 moderate to severe stage, the focus of Brilacidin's clinical trials.