Thursday, July 01, 2021 4:34:26 PM
Thank you for your insights and clear reasoning.
Another unrelated question:
Why is it generally accepted in the courts that the NWS did not constitute a purchase of new securities?
Seems to me that the NWS doesn't have much, if anything in common with the original contract. It pays a dividend, sure, but that dividend isn't even based on Treasury's share count. Couldn't this be construed as the purchase of new securities which would be barred by HERA since it took place after 2009?
Another unrelated question:
Why is it generally accepted in the courts that the NWS did not constitute a purchase of new securities?
Seems to me that the NWS doesn't have much, if anything in common with the original contract. It pays a dividend, sure, but that dividend isn't even based on Treasury's share count. Couldn't this be construed as the purchase of new securities which would be barred by HERA since it took place after 2009?
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
