Friday, June 25, 2021 11:50:45 AM
in response to this one:
sure, and then you can shoot them in the head and push them into the water right? lol...
in response to this one:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164594890
at what point do i give up? well. so the supreme court decided that this was a takings case instead of an apa case. there is still a case there. the companies at present are still retaining earnings. their prices suggest that they are not retaining earnings or interested in capital raises.
in response to this post:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595227
not sure why you would say that. the contract claims and takings claims are valid along with the constitutional claims.
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595725
have fun fishing.
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595876
could be doing better, but it is what it is.
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595221
of course you would. not sure why you would do that now, seems backwards to be honest. i would recommend the opposite, frankly, seeing as how preferred underperformed
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164596739
it is unclear what you mean, but enjoy reading the writing on the wall.
sure, and then you can shoot them in the head and push them into the water right? lol...
in response to this one:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164594890
at what point do i give up? well. so the supreme court decided that this was a takings case instead of an apa case. there is still a case there. the companies at present are still retaining earnings. their prices suggest that they are not retaining earnings or interested in capital raises.
in response to this post:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595227
not sure why you would say that. the contract claims and takings claims are valid along with the constitutional claims.
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595725
have fun fishing.
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595876
could be doing better, but it is what it is.
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164595221
of course you would. not sure why you would do that now, seems backwards to be honest. i would recommend the opposite, frankly, seeing as how preferred underperformed
in response to this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164596739
it is unclear what you mean, but enjoy reading the writing on the wall.
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM

