Thursday, June 24, 2021 2:27:36 PM
Let's start at the beginning. Collins petitioned for two items:
"1. Whether FHFA’s structure violates the separation of powers; and
2. Whether the courts must set aside a final agency action that FHFA took when it was unconstitutionally structured and strike down the statutory provisions that make FHFA independent."
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-422/116983/20190925131502103_Collins%20Petition--PDFA.pdf
Collins won on item 1. Lost on item 2 on the "statutory provisions". But SCOTUS made a HUGE concession to Collins in allowing them to proceed in the lower court on the constitutional claim. There has been a lot of negative feedback on SCOTUS ruling, but they were limited by the case in front of them. As plaintiff Liotta said, it wasn't the ideal case, but it was the approach they moved them to SCOTUS.
I keep reading posts that FHFA can appropriate all of Fannie and Freddie equity for the benefit of the taxpayer. That's not what SCOTUS ruled. In fact, only time it mentions taxpayer is in the sentence, "First, the Recovery Act authorized Treasury to purchase Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s stock if it determined that infusing the companies with capital would protect taxpayers and be beneficial to the financial and mortgage markets."
I think the misunderstanding comes from these two sentences, "From there, the Agency has the authority to take control of the companies’ assets and operations, conduct business on their behalf, and transfer or sell any of their assets or liabilities. §§4617(b)(2)(B)–(C), (G). In performing these functions, the Agency may exercise whatever incidental powers it deems necessary, and it may take any authorized action that is in the best interests of the companies or the Agency itself. §4617(b)(2)(J)." Sending money to Treasury for Obamacare or possibly building the Wall are not in the best interests of the companies or the Agency. During the remand, Treasury should be asked where the $301 billion was spent. If it wasn't on housing, to capitalize Fannie & Freddie (Carlos' Secret Plan) or the running of FHFA, it wasn't authorized and should be returned.
"1. Whether FHFA’s structure violates the separation of powers; and
2. Whether the courts must set aside a final agency action that FHFA took when it was unconstitutionally structured and strike down the statutory provisions that make FHFA independent."
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-422/116983/20190925131502103_Collins%20Petition--PDFA.pdf
Collins won on item 1. Lost on item 2 on the "statutory provisions". But SCOTUS made a HUGE concession to Collins in allowing them to proceed in the lower court on the constitutional claim. There has been a lot of negative feedback on SCOTUS ruling, but they were limited by the case in front of them. As plaintiff Liotta said, it wasn't the ideal case, but it was the approach they moved them to SCOTUS.
I keep reading posts that FHFA can appropriate all of Fannie and Freddie equity for the benefit of the taxpayer. That's not what SCOTUS ruled. In fact, only time it mentions taxpayer is in the sentence, "First, the Recovery Act authorized Treasury to purchase Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s stock if it determined that infusing the companies with capital would protect taxpayers and be beneficial to the financial and mortgage markets."
I think the misunderstanding comes from these two sentences, "From there, the Agency has the authority to take control of the companies’ assets and operations, conduct business on their behalf, and transfer or sell any of their assets or liabilities. §§4617(b)(2)(B)–(C), (G). In performing these functions, the Agency may exercise whatever incidental powers it deems necessary, and it may take any authorized action that is in the best interests of the companies or the Agency itself. §4617(b)(2)(J)." Sending money to Treasury for Obamacare or possibly building the Wall are not in the best interests of the companies or the Agency. During the remand, Treasury should be asked where the $301 billion was spent. If it wasn't on housing, to capitalize Fannie & Freddie (Carlos' Secret Plan) or the running of FHFA, it wasn't authorized and should be returned.
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Reports Net Income of $3.7 Billion for First Quarter 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/29/2026 11:24:00 AM
- Fannie Mae Releases March 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 04/28/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Plans to Report First Quarter 2026 Financial Results on April 29, 2026 • PR Newswire (US) • 04/27/2026 12:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Credit Score Model Updates to Advance Credit Score Modernization • PR Newswire (US) • 04/22/2026 05:02:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
