Here is the regulation that prevents Emergency Use Authorization if there already exists an effective treatment (such as ivermectin/hydroxy)
My comments: This is way Fauci and big-pharma had to suppress any effective therapeutic:
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies:
QUOTE
(c) Criteria for issuance of authorization
The Secretary may issue an authorization under this section with respect to the emergency use of a product only if, after consultation with the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (to the extent feasible and appropriate given the applicable circumstances described in subsection (b)(1)), the Secretary concludes—
. . .
(3) that there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or condition;`
. . .
(e) Conditions of authorization
(1) Unapproved product
(A) Required conditions
With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Secretary, to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances described in subsection (b)(1), shall, for a person who carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued, establish such conditions on an authorization under this section as the Secretary finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public health, including the following:
. . .
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.