InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 713
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2012

Re: mjbaker84 post# 171250

Monday, 06/21/2021 8:47:57 AM

Monday, June 21, 2021 8:47:57 AM

Post# of 232084
Like every Cytoscam PR, this is meaningless without context.

What were the scores and how much improvement was there. 18/25 then saying "not meant for statistical significance" is IMO an admission that the drug was SAFE but wouldn't have achieve stat sig. Therefore, outside of Gaylis, who was given shares, and therefore the FDA would toss the data, who else is going to sign up for an experimental project that Janet Woodcock publicly shamed?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News