News Focus
News Focus
Followers 210
Posts 32738
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: MackG post# 362291

Saturday, 06/12/2021 6:33:59 PM

Saturday, June 12, 2021 6:33:59 PM

Post# of 405181
"Where you stopped reading is where investors started reading."

I guess you're the spokesperson for investors.
The fact is that "Go,JFM!" misrepresented what I said. If the people you purport to represent understood and agreed with the substance of his post both you and they didn't understand mine.

In fact he said the same thing that I did and then suggested that I was mistaken:
The RBL could have been paid by IPIX without nullifying the RBL's independence.
The Data Monitoring committee is "independent".
The Company's auditors are "independent".
Both entities are paid by IPIX.

We would know how IPIX spent their R&D money, their largest operating expense by far, if they saw fit to tell us. So far they haven't.
How much is being spent on the current trial, for instance? Is that too much to ask? Based on its own public information reporting the Company seems to think so.
Now it's time for you to tell me that investors don't care about that.

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001355250&owner=include&count=40
http://www.ipharminc.com/press-release

I'm tryin ta think but nuttin happens......Curly

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y