1. Through the Objections, Griffin continues to cling to theories which have been debunked or are inaccurate foundationally. A prime example of the latter is the assertion by Griffin and other members of Class 19 that they are beneficiaries of the Trust, or, in Griffin’s words, “Legacy Holders.” They are neither. As set forth in prior pleadings, in accordance with the Final Decree, the only beneficiary of the Trust is a charity designated to receive the remaining limited Trust assets—which assets are being whittled away due to Griffin’s actions. Secondly, there is no such thing as a “Legacy Holder” and Griffin was never in possession of, or entitled to, Liquidating Trust Interests. The escrow markers that were generated for the limited purpose of facilitating a distribution of shares of the Reorganized Debtor’s common stock that were held in the so-called “Disputed Equity Escrow” are not themselves rights to future distributions of Trust assets or anything of value, nor were they ever. Such escrow markers were a tool; they did not have, and do not have, any value in and of themselves. As such, Griffin’s premise for any ongoing interest is once again faulty. Page 2 http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229210610000000000001