I finished my last post by saying Tesla doesn't mess around! I want to explain the significance of that comment as it pertains to anyone implying , that a company might be not fully in truth, when documenting its attributes , to a court , when involved in attempting to win acquisition and court assignment of something , as serious as NAL.
Tesla does extensive research into a company’s integrity ( telling truths and doing exactly what they say they are going to do, historically). This is the reason that we ( I) can rest assured that a company Tesla chooses to enter into a long term, supply/ offtake agreement, that company did win the bid , partly because they are tried and true, to present a standard of integrity that will not conflict with Teslas standard. Tesla cannot afford to take on shady companies, as their reputation cannot be brought into question , down the line. Tesla( this is what i understand) applies extensive research dollars to come up with any business or political practices that could mar the Tesla name, and this is a Tesla mandate.
I like that , and if Tesla has found a comp lily white, and has put their seal of approval on it thru a business agreement, i cease to be concerned.
That happened with Piedmont.
Then:! Using their own standards, Piedmont chose to be in partnership at a full 25% , with allll of Sayonas policies and historic , and future: .......Auss. , Canadian , and US govt. alliances , employment practices, First Nations Peoples policies, green compliances, land acquisitions and trades, explorations, mining , assaying, transportations, processing, distribution agreements( everything Tesla found desirable and approved in Tesla/Piedmont 5 year agreement.).
Sayona would inflict problems on the Tesla/ Piedmont alliance, if they reported false attributes to the Canadian courts. And dont think Piedmont would be lax in overseeing what Sayona put forth to the courts. Everything Say reports to the Can court sysytem is in fullest partnership with. piedmont( and by extension??? 5 years out with Tesla???) And certainly, do not think the Tesla research team did not examine those attribution declarations carefully. All IMO.
This was all done so “ fine” and I am wondering what Tesla may be considering of future business operations with any of what I am thinking the sour grapes??? Honestly, this is one persons opinion, and I am not encouraging anyone here to agree with me. It is strictly to be seen as considerations. Glta. Thankyou .
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
