News Focus
News Focus

ano

Followers 41
Posts 825
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/08/2015

ano

Re: Donotunderstand post# 678574

Tuesday, 05/18/2021 7:40:43 PM

Tuesday, May 18, 2021 7:40:43 PM

Post# of 869463
yes, very good question, the 165,910M is what Fannie paid during 2012-2019, (it also paid $20B from 2008-2011) normally in the media they combine the two(FnF), to the $301B paid, the 10% is an issue in itself, as when those will be added/deducted, the government also will have to pay the 10% from the moment the loan was paid back, as that was the deal, as treasury should receive a reasonable return for its investment, so should FnF
the $11,401M in interest treasury has to pay to Fannie will likely not result in political satisfaction as they only would have received $12,419M in interest, sure they wanted the 10%, but not the boomerang effect (each month effective Q3 2019 the treasury will need to pay $272M to Fannie starting with the $6.5B balance) So what can we say about it, if they want the $1B difference or not, it will not be a big deal, either way, we just need to wait on SCOTUS and see what is and is not legal, my guess is SCOTUS will not talk about the 10% and just leaves it open for interpretation, it also would not surprise me if we never hear from the 10% interest again, it is just too difficult
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FNMA News