Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,522.00
(
0.33%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
91.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
73,592.15
(
0.31%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 98414
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

CombJelly

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 7
Posts 2959
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2002

CombJelly

Re: wbmw post# 78605

Saturday, 01/20/2007 11:11:33 PM

Saturday, January 20, 2007 11:11:33 PM

Post# of 98414
"You could write a program that continued to add 1+1 forever, and that would take 100% of the CPU as far as Task Manager is concerned."

No it wouldn't. If it doesn't hit the OS periodically, then it is flagged as non-responsive. If it can boot the OS and run at least subset tasks, then chances are it can run more complicated ones. You are grasping at straws here. Please don't embarrass yourself so openly.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMD News
More AMD News