InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6693
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: Zilla post# 673396

Wednesday, 04/14/2021 5:33:39 PM

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:33:39 PM

Post# of 793270

I'm confused why common and JPS are bickering.



It all boils down to a disagreement over what the common shares will be worth, and to a lesser extent whether or not (and at what ratio) a junior-to-common conversion occurs.

Accusations of bias get thrown both ways, but at least personally I can say that if the prefs were to stay at current prices and the commons were to drop to $0.60 or so, I would switch all my prefs to commons (assuming no significant news). The only reason I don't own the commons is because I think the juniors will outperform from today's market prices, and that has been true for years. The pref:common ratio has never gotten high enough for me to take a significant common position, but I know the point at which I would switch.

If commons run from their 2 bucks to 10 that's the same % gain and people will use it as a trading vehicle to make money both ways, but wityh millions more trading it, I could easily see a run to 20.



I would recommend you develop an estimate for the future common price that takes into account the (then-expanded) share count. I posted my framework a couple of years ago, and if anything it was optimistic compared to what we know now (the letter agreement envisions up to $140B of common equity raises while I assumed $100B).

I don't think the economics support a final (post-raise) share price above $8, and I don't think there will be enough euphoria over a Supreme Court victory (which likely won't be the end of the case) to outweigh that.




(from another post)

Just checked it out and 1 post in a month a few more two months ago so that's probably why they post here. LOL Reminds me of the WaMu boards back in the day, now COOP. LOL



There is no "pref board" or "common board" regardless of the desires of some. This board is the de facto place to discuss both the prefs and commons, as evidenced by post activity. It also makes sense from a practical point of view: very few events would impact the commons or juniors without affecting the other, and many investors own both. Consolidating all discussion of both makes perfect sense, and it has happened.

The name of this board being "FNMA" doesn't make it a "common board" either; if the name meant that much then any discussion of only Freddie, much of which happens here, should occur only on the FMCC board.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.